 | R. Michael DeWine (R) Earmark Reform Rating: 16.66 |
| # | Date | Description | Vote |
|---|---|---|---|
| 160 | 2005-06-28 | S. Amdt 1003 to H.R. 2361: Coburn Amdt. No. 1003: To require a conference report inclusion of limitations, directives and earmarks | |
| 260 | 2005-10-20 | S. Amdt. 2093 to H.R. 3058: Motion To Table Coburn Amdt. No. 2093 To prohibit any funds under the Act from being used for a parking facility as part of the Joslyn Art Museum | |
| 262 | 2005-10-25 | S. Amdt 2165 to H.R. 3058: Redirects funds from two dubious Alaska bridge projects to reconstruction of New Orleans bridge damaged by Katrina | Supported Reform |
| 99 | 2006-04-26 | S. Amdt 3641 to Div. I, H.R. 4939: Would strike $700 million to relocate a recently repaired train track in Miss., reduction in wasteful spending rejected | |
| 226 | 2006-08-03 | S. Amdt 4848 to H.R. 5631: To require notice to Congress and the public on earmarks of funds available to the Department of Defense. | Supported Reform |
| 106 | 2007-03-27 | Thomas Amendment No. 515; To prevent the adding of extraneous earmarks to an emergency war supplemental. | |
| 121 | 2007-03-28 | Coburn amendment to eliminate $100 million earmark for presidential conventions on the first supplemental | |
| 134 | 2007-04-18 | S. AMDT 891 to S. 378: On the motion to table Coburn Amdt. No. 891 (re: offsetting costs of government programs) | |
| 140 | 2007-04-24 | S. AMDT 917 to S. 761: Motion to table Coburn amdt. No 917 (re: offset costs of government programs) | |
| 142 | 2007-04-25 | DeMint Amdt. No. 930; To prohibit congressional earmarks of funds appropriated pursuant to authorizations in the bill. | |
| 164 | 2007-05-15 | Coburn amendment to require Katrina victims in LA to have housing before building a new Army Corps visitors center | |
| 163 | 2007-05-15 | S. AMDT. 1090 to H.R. 1495: Coburn Amdt. No. 1090; To prioritize Federal spending to ensure the residents of the city of Sacramento are protected from the threat of floods before spending money to add sand to beaches in San Diego. |
 | George V. Voinovich (R) Earmark Reform Rating: 41.66 |
| # | Date | Description | Vote |
|---|---|---|---|
| 160 | 2005-06-28 | S. Amdt 1003 to H.R. 2361: Coburn Amdt. No. 1003: To require a conference report inclusion of limitations, directives and earmarks | Opposed Reform |
| 260 | 2005-10-20 | S. Amdt. 2093 to H.R. 3058: Motion To Table Coburn Amdt. No. 2093 To prohibit any funds under the Act from being used for a parking facility as part of the Joslyn Art Museum | Opposed Reform |
| 262 | 2005-10-25 | S. Amdt 2165 to H.R. 3058: Redirects funds from two dubious Alaska bridge projects to reconstruction of New Orleans bridge damaged by Katrina | Opposed Reform |
| 99 | 2006-04-26 | S. Amdt 3641 to Div. I, H.R. 4939: Would strike $700 million to relocate a recently repaired train track in Miss., reduction in wasteful spending rejected | Supported Reform |
| 226 | 2006-08-03 | S. Amdt 4848 to H.R. 5631: To require notice to Congress and the public on earmarks of funds available to the Department of Defense. | Supported Reform |
| 106 | 2007-03-27 | Thomas Amendment No. 515; To prevent the adding of extraneous earmarks to an emergency war supplemental. | Supported Reform |
| 121 | 2007-03-28 | Coburn amendment to eliminate $100 million earmark for presidential conventions on the first supplemental | Supported Reform |
| 134 | 2007-04-18 | S. AMDT 891 to S. 378: On the motion to table Coburn Amdt. No. 891 (re: offsetting costs of government programs) | Opposed Reform |
| 140 | 2007-04-24 | S. AMDT 917 to S. 761: Motion to table Coburn amdt. No 917 (re: offset costs of government programs) | Supported Reform |
| 142 | 2007-04-25 | DeMint Amdt. No. 930; To prohibit congressional earmarks of funds appropriated pursuant to authorizations in the bill. | Not Voting |
| 164 | 2007-05-15 | Coburn amendment to require Katrina victims in LA to have housing before building a new Army Corps visitors center | Opposed Reform |
| 163 | 2007-05-15 | S. AMDT. 1090 to H.R. 1495: Coburn Amdt. No. 1090; To prioritize Federal spending to ensure the residents of the city of Sacramento are protected from the threat of floods before spending money to add sand to beaches in San Diego. | Opposed Reform |