About
In the beginning

Founders
Glenn Reynolds
N.Z. Bear

Pork Issues
Pork Hall of Shame
HHS Earmarks
Who Put a Secret Hold on Government Transparency?

General Pork
How to Find Pork

Congressional News
Hotline Blog
The Hill

Other Porkbusters
Citizens Against Government Waste
Heritage Foundation
The Examiner
The Sunlight Foundation
Americans for Prosperity
The Club for Growth

Contact
bear
at
truthlaidbear
dot
com


Porkbusters Store
Get Porkbusters Gear!

Hosted By





Porker's of The Month - September 2006
September 26, 2006 10:30 AM

Posted at Liberally Conservative:

Washington, D.C. Citizens Against Government Waste (CAGW) named all

171 members of Congress

who voted against the disclosure of earmarks Porkers of the Month. On September 14, the House voted 245-171 for an internal rule change (H. Res. 1000) that requires all earmarks and their sponsors to be identified in spending, tax, and authorization bills.


xxx

“This is a serious step toward opening up the earmarking process,” CAGW President Tom Schatz said. “Much remains to be done to end the abuse of earmarks, but that is no reason for voting against what is clearly an improvement over the status quo.”


xxx

Of the 171 votes against the resolution, 147 were from Democrats. Twenty-two of the 24 nay votes from Republicans were members of the Appropriations Committee, infamous for its swollen earmarks, although not all on the committee opposed the measure. Committee Chairman Jerry Lewis (R-Calif.) had complained that the new requirement singled out appropriations bills but said that he would not whip the vote. Most earmarks are anonymously slipped into spending bills by individual appropriators without debate. The 2006 Congressional Pig Book identified 9,963 pork projects costing a record $29 billion in the fiscal 2006 appropriations bills.


xxx

Changes to House rules are only in effect through the end of the current Congress, although House leaders have indicated that it would be renewed at the start of the new term. The House rule would also have no effect on the Senate’s earmark procedure, but the House changes are already helping to spur similar action in the Senate.


xxx

House Appropriations Committee Ranking Member David Obey (D-Wis.) called the rules change a “trivial pursuit” and House Rules Committee Ranking Member Louise M. Slaughter (D-N.Y.) called it “shameful” and “a sham.” What is shameful is voting to oppose even the slightest exposure of the earmark process. Ironically, most of the “nay” voters undoubtedly have long lists of pet projects procured from the pork barrel proudly displayed on their websites.


xxx

Partisan politics and self-interest clearly influenced what was an easy vote for transparency and accountability. For ignoring taxpayers’ outrage over the waste and corruption of pork-barrel spending, CAGW names the 171 ‘nay’ voters on H. Res. 1000 Porkers of the Month for September 2006.


xxx

Citizens Against Government Waste is the nation’s largest nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to eliminating waste, fraud, abuse, and mismanagement in government. Porker of the Month is a dubious honor given to lawmakers, government officials, and political candidates who have shown a blatant disregard for the interests of taxpayers.

...read complete post at Liberally Conservative

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://truthlaidbear.com/mt-tbns.r142.cgi/3288

Comments

Post a comment

Name:
Email:
URL:
Remember personal info?
Comments: (you may use HTML tags for style)